1
35
Discussion
studies in adult populations which identified the
abducens n,7erve as the most vulnerable in various pa-
3
To our knowledge, no large series of cranial neuropa-
thies on Nigerian children is available. This study is
limited due to the small number of subjects and investi-
gative handicap but the findings appear to offer some
reasonable and helpful clues as to the pattern of cranial
palsy and the aetiopathologies in Nigerian children. We
regard this as a preliminary study which is to lay a foun-
dation for more elaborate, and hopefully, a multicentre
survey. Being preliminary, we do not intend to relate the
result to other available studies but just discuss the find-
ings as they are.
thologies. This may be related to the aetiology. Com-
paratively, meningitis and viral infections such as rhi-
novirus and Herpes Simplex are more common events in
children. The inflammatory swelling with compression
and subsequent paralysis of the VII nerve in its long
course within the facial canal may be an additional rea-
son w8,9hy the facial nerve is most vulnerable in chil-
dren.
Vincristine, a component of chemotherapy in
childho10od leukaemia, can cause neuropathy as a side
effect.
Interestingly, despite the high prevalence paediatric
HIV/AIDS in Nigerian children, the study did not cap-
The study has identified intracranial infections as the
most probable cause of cranial nerve palsy in Nigerian
children. In contrast, cranial palsies are frequently seen
as post-traumatic and ischaemic syndromes in adult
ture any case; we are unable to explain
this. It is
also interesting that intracranial tumour did not feature
in this survey. Solid intracranial tumours are known to
be rare in Nigerian paediatric population.
3
population. In this series intracranial infection alone
constituted 76.5% nerve damage. A majority of the chil-
dren (60.8%) derived their neuropathy from infection.
The aetiology of Bell’s palsy may not be completely
understood; however, a reactivation of herpes simplex
virus type 1 (HSV-,51) infection has been postulated to
Conclusion
4
cause the disease. Also, multiple case reports have
In conclusion, Cranial nerve palsies may be a common
clinical problem encountered in neurological practice
and their presence is an indication of an underlying in-
tracranial pathology. The incapacitation and the cos-
metic disfigurement they create can be a cause of great
concern to the physician, patients and parents. That in-
tracranial infections constitute the commonest cause
places a premium on prompt diagnosis and therapeutic
intervention in children with these underlying disease
conditions. But more importantly is the relevance of
routine immunisation against common bacterial and
viral agents causing meningitides and encephalitis in the
environment. Sometimes, despite extensive biochemical
and radiological work-up, the accurate diagnosis may
not be established. Few such patients represent
"idiopathic" variety of cranial nerve 1involvement and
show good response to corticosteroids.
described Bell’s palsy following immunization with
6
influenza and hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccines. Proba-
bly, these attenuated live-vaccines can convert to be-
come neurovirulent. Considering these postulations, the
three cases with Bell’s palsy may additionally be re-
garded as being infective in origin. This association be-
tween infections and cranial neuropathy underscores the
importance of prompt diagnosis and therapeutic inter-
vention in children with these conditions. But more
importantly is the relevance of routine immunisation
against common bacterial and viral agents causing
meningits and encephalitis in the environment.
The study has shown that the most susceptible cranial
nerve is the facial (38.3%), with the affection of the ocu-
lomotor (8%) and abducens (7%) to a less extent. In the
present study, a majority of the underlying disease
entities have involved nerve VII. This is in contrast to
References
1
2
.
.
Garg RK, Karak B. Multiple cra-
nial neuropathy: a common diag-
nostic problem. J Assoc Physi-
cians India. 1999; 47: 1003-7.
Carroll CG, Campbell WW. Multi-
ple cranial neuropathies. Semin
Neurol 2009; 29: 53-65.
5. Thaera GM, Wellik KE, Barrs
8. Martin JH. Neuroanatomy Text
and Atlas, 3rd ed. McGraw-Hill,
New York 2003.
9. Guarav D, Atul D, Diksha K. vin-
cristine induced neuropathy. JAPI
2012;60:56-60
10. Suprlya S, Asit R D, Kaushik S,
Chandra D. Simultaneous isolated
bilateral facial nerve palsy: A rare
vincristine –associated toxicity.
Ind J Med Sc. 2009;63(8):355-8.
DM, et al . Are corticosteroid and
antiviral treatments effective for
Bell’s palsy: a critically appraised
topic. Neurologist. 2010; 16: 138-
140.
6. Rath B, Linder T, Cornblath D, et
al. All that palsies is not Bell’s
palsy- the need to define Bell’s
palsy as an adverse event follow-
ing immunization. Vaccine 2007;
3
.
Keane JR. Bilateral involvement
of a single cranial nerve: analysis
of 578 cases. Neurology. 2005; 65
2
6: 1-14.
(6): 950-2.
7
.
Rowe F. Prevalence of ocular
motor cranial nerve palsy and
associations following stroke. Eye.
4
.
Hato N, Yamada H, Kohno M, et
al. Valacyclovir and prednisolone
treatment for Bell’s palsy: a multi-
centre, randomised placebo-
2
011; 25: 881-7.
http://www.physiotherapy-
treatment.com/7th-cranial-
nerve.html
controlled study. Otol Neurotol
2
007; 28: 408-413.